Click on a question to reveal the answer.
Don’t panic. Continuing Healthcare (CHC) is a complex area of health policy which has been baffling medical and legal professionals alike for many years. It is quite normal to feel overwhelmed if you are new to this system.
We suggest that you start with our free Navigational Toolkit. The pack is fully downloadable and also contains the contact details of organisations offering free advice and support across the UK. Alternatively, if you have a question or would like to discuss anything about your situation, please call us on 0345 548 0300 or send us a ‘Talk to us’ request to schedule a free consultation with a trained NHS continuing healthcare adviser.
NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) is a package of care that some people need to receive as a result of a disability, accident or illness. People who meet the eligibility requirements will have the full cost of their care funded by the NHS. Continuing Healthcare is available to any UK resident over the age of 18 who is assessed as having a primary health need (see Question 5 for more information on primary health needs).
Following the principles established by the Coughlan judgement (see ‘Coughlan and Case Law’ FAQ section), Local Authorities were prevented from providing registered nursing services. Instead, the Department of Health introduced Registered Nursing Care Contributions (RNCC) whereby the NHS paid contributions to residents of care homes with nursing. There were 3 RNCC bands; low, medium and high. The band you received depended on the intensity of your nursing needs which were assessed annually.
With the introduction of the National Framework in 2007 RNCC was replaced by a single payment for all residents of nursing homes, known as NHS-Funded Nursing Care (FNC). Residents who had been in receipt of low or medium band RNCC were automatically moved to the FNC single band, and residents who had previously been in receipt of high band RNCC remained on that rate.
If you feel that you or your loved one needs an assessment for continuing healthcare you should ask your GP, social worker, district nurse, care home nurse or other health professional for a Checklist assessment. This is the first stage of the assessment process and all the professionals listed above are qualified to complete the paperwork. Alternatively you can contact your Integrated Care Board’s (ICB) Continuing Healthcare department to request an assessment. You can find contact details for your local ICB by searching for ‘services near you’ here.
CHC is not something that can be ‘claimed’ in the way that one might have a ‘claim’ for compensation over the misselling of financial products, for example. For some people the trigger for an assessment may be a fall or a stroke where long-term care is required after a hospital admission, however there are many circumstances in which a person may require an assessment. If you are not sure whether you will be eligible, we would recommend that you get a Checklist assessment completed to find out.
In theory you should be referred for a Checklist assessment automatically if your health deteriorates to the point where an assessment is necessary and your care is being overseen by a health or social care professional. This does not always happen though and people do sometimes slip through the net, particularly where individuals are funding their own care.
In most cases, checklists are completed outside of hospital. This ensures an accurate assessment and reduces the likelihood of complications. The hospital should have a team responsible for discharge, who should identify who needs a Checklist. If they agree it is needed, they should arrange for one to be completed when your relative has moved back to the community.
Depending on local policy, there might be some temporary funding available for after discharge. This could be to support either more recovery at home or further assessment of needs. You may wish to check with the hospital what funding is available. If a checklist is actioned as part of a discharge, temporary funding should continue until a decision is made on eligibility.
Ideally, the discharge team should action a checklist for anyone with significant ongoing support needs, or who moves to a care home registered for nursing. It is a good idea to ask the discharge team if they will action a checklist, and for the reasons for their decision in writing.
If your relative is discharged with no Checklist arranged, or if they are already in the community, you can ask any health or social care professional to fill it out for you, if they are trained to do so. This could include a member of the local council such as a social worker or care manager, a GP, or a registered nurse such as a district nurse. Depending on local policy, this might also include a registered nurse from a care home.
If there are no professionals who can fill out the Checklist, your next step should be to contact the local Integrated Care Board (ICB). This is the institution responsible for continuing healthcare assessments. The ICB does not have to complete checklists themselves initially, but they do have a responsibility to ensure you have access to it. If you are struggling to get the checklist filled out, the ICB should send an assessor, or support you in getting local professionals to complete it.
This is not an easy concept to apply in the context of an assessment which explains why the application of the criteria is open to individual interpretation, even for professionally trained and experienced assessment teams. Essentially, if the majority of your care is to manage your health needs or to prevent further health needs from developing, the NHS has a duty to pay for all of your care needs and accommodation.
So what constitutes a health need? One might assume that a person suffering from dementia who is immobile and unable to wash, dress or feed themselves independently, who requires continence care and the administration of a medication regime by a trained carer would have a primary health need. This is not necessarily so and such needs are often seen as social or personal care needs, although we should be careful not to overgeneralize.
For a fuller explanation please download or request a copy of our free Navigational Toolkit here.
In the following years, a number of changes were introduced to the health and social care system which we’ve summarised for you:
1996 – Department of Health provided guidance to England’s 95 Health Authorities to write the first sets of criteria on NHS continuing healthcare eligibility.
1999 – Pamela Coughlan won a landmark appeal case against a ruling that she was ineligible for continuing healthcare funding. Following the Court of Appeal decision, the Department of Health instructed all Health Authorities to review their criteria to ensure it was ‘Coughlan compliant’.
2002 – NHS underwent reorganisation. 95 Health Authorities were abolished and replaced with 28 Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs). Department of Health issued further instruction to all SHAs to agree upon a set criteria within each area.
2002 – Following an investigation into NHS continuing healthcare by the Health Service Ombudsman, the Department of Health again instructed all 28 SHAs to review their criteria and bring it in line with the Coughlan judgement. They were also asked to retrospectively review everyone who had been in receipt of long-term nursing care since April 1996, providing compensation where the criteria had been applied restrictively.
2004 – Each SHA in England were working to their own set of criteria and toolkits which led to what became known as the ‘postcode lottery’, where eligibility was partly dependent upon where you lived. This problem was recognised by the Department of Health and in 2004, they began developing a national set of tools and assessment processes to clarify key areas of contention.
2006 – A further NHS reorganisation saw the 28 Strategic Health Authorities merged into just 10 as well as a significant reduction in the number of Primary Care Trusts (PCTs).
2007 – National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS-Funded Nursing Care was launched. All NHS trusts were instructed to fully implement the Framework by October.
2009 – Department of Health issued a revised National Framework in July, following wide consultation since initial launch
2012 – Department of Health issued a revised National Framework in November. The main purpose of the latest revision was to bring terminology in line with the pending restructure of the NHS and incorporate the Department of Health’s 2010 Practice Guidance into the Framework.
2013 – Primary Care Trusts were replaced with a greater number of Integrated Care Board (ICBs). ICBs become responsible for implementing the National Framework with the NHS Commissioning Board (NHS England) replacing the role of Strategic Health Authorities in commissioning responsibilities and reviewing eligibility decisions.
2015 – NHS England publishes the Operating Model for NHS Continuing Healthcare which brings together the NHS’ overall approach and aims to help NHS trusts achieve the best possible assessment and care pathways for individuals. 2015 also saw the introduction of the Care Act 2014 which represented the first major change in adult social care legislation for 70 years, but did not change the legal limits of Local Authorities to provide health care. Therefore, the primary health need boundary (NHS continuing healthcare eligibility criteria) was maintained.
2018 – On 1 March 2018 an updated version of the National Framework came into use, primarily to reflect the implementation of the Care Act 2014; update the definition of a ‘social care need’; improve the nature of annual CHC reviews; clarify ‘top ups’; clarify the make-up of the multidisciplinary team; and strengthen the guidance around CCGs’ commissioning responsibilities.
2022 – On 1 July 2022 an updated version of the National Framework came into use, primarily to incorporate the legislative changes brought about by the Health and Care Act 2022 (which transferred statutory responsibility for CHC from Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) to Integrated Care Boards (ICBs)); to strengthen guidance around the relationship between CHC and the Discharge to Assess model, incorporating recent best practice and aligning with new policy; and to clarify when consent and participation should be sought throughout the CHC journey.
A common misconception is that the “criteria for continuing healthcare have changed since 2007”. This is an excuse we have heard numerous times from professionals to justify people suddenly dropping out of eligibility at their annual review when assessments reflect no significant change in their care needs. It is important to note that despite the four revisions to the National Framework in 2009, 2012, 2018 and 2022, the criteria for eligibility have not changed. Instead, the revisions made adjustments to the toolkits and assessment processes.
Although far fewer continuing healthcare assessments are carried out for people in care homes without nursing than care homes with nursing, assessments must be based on the individual’s assessed care needs, regardless of where that care is delivered or whether the setting is appropriate. Our experience has shown that some assessment teams still struggle to apply this important principle.
If you think you should have been considered for NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) funding but were not, it may be possible to request a retrospective review of these ‘previously unassessed periods of care’ (PUPoC) and receive a reimbursement of these costs. An assessment may be made for care that the individual has funded either in full or in part, and you can raise this with your local Integrated Care Board (ICB).
An assessment for a Previously Unassessed Period of Care (PUPoC) may be undertaken for those currently paying for their care, or for individuals who have passed away, but it may only date back to care provided after 1 April 2012 (unless in ‘exceptional circumstances’). This is because in November 2007 the opportunity to request a review where the majority of care had taken place prior to 1 April 2004 was closed by the Department of Health. A further ‘close down’ was announced on 15 March 2012, relating to requests between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2012.
Many CHC firms will tell you to apply for a PUPoC assessment whatever the costs as you have a good chance of being successful. In our experience you should approach these assurances with caution as out of those who apply, only a very small percentage of individuals are successful in their application for PUPoC funding. No firm, regardless of credentials or experience, can guarantee a favourable outcome to an application.
The 12 care domains are:
- Breathing
- Nutrition (food & drink)
- Continence
- Skin and tissue viability
- Mobility
- Communication
- Psychological and emotional needs
- Cognition
- Behaviour
- Drug therapies and medication
- Altered states of consciousness
- Other significant care needs
The evidence that is used to populate the DST may include care plans, hospital records, social care records, GP records, daily care records, medication charts and risk assessments. In short, any written or verbal information relating to your needs within the assessment period should be summarised in the DST so that the assessment team (MDT) are able to make a fully informed recommendation about your eligibility for continuing healthcare. Financial records should not normally be included because eligibility for continuing healthcare is not means tested and should be free from financial influences.
For more information about the DST please download or request a copy of our free Navigational Toolkit.
The principle of MDT assessments goes even further. Ideally, the MDT who provide information for the completion of the Decision Support Tool (DST) should consist of all health and social care professionals who are knowledgeable about your needs. That same MDT should be involved in making a recommendation as to whether or not you are eligible for continuing healthcare.
So, although ICBs are allowed to only use two health professionals from different healthcare professions, strictly they should use all the health and social care professionals currently or recently involved in the delivery of your care.
Unlikely, for two reasons. Firstly, many health and social care professionals including GPs and consultants do not fully understand the continuing healthcare criteria. If the professional has not spent time working within the dedicated field of NHS Continuing Healthcare they may not fully understand it.
Secondly, eligibility is based upon the presence of a primary health need which is established through an in-depth assessment process in which a Multidisciplinary Team assesses the totality of your needs. Until this process has taken place nobody can unilaterally decide that an individual will or will not be eligible.
If you receive care in your own home it may fall to your GP, social worker or district nurse to ensure the appropriate assessments have been carried out. In theory this should mean that nobody falls ‘through the net’ however in reality, appropriate referrals are not always made by health and social care professionals which means many people may have been in receipt of nursing care for years but have never been assessed for continuing healthcare.
If your relative/loved one has never received a continuing healthcare assessment and you think they should have please see the question ‘4. How do I claim continuing healthcare?’ above or contact us for further information.
Depending on the progression of the illness a person with dementia, Parkinson’s disease or any other disability or illness will present with a number of health and social care needs, some of which may well be intense, complex and/or unpredictable. If any one particular health need or a combination of those needs is assessed as being of an intensity, complexity or level of unpredictability that means their primary need is for health, then they will be eligible for continuing healthcare.
The National Framework for CHC is absolutely clear about this issue and makes provisions to ensure that decisions regarding eligibility are free from budgetary and commissioner influences. Beacon’s caseworkers have dealt with cases in the past where commissioner influence on decision-making panels had clearly occurred. In each case our challenge to this procedural failure was upheld and the assessment process started again.
No. Continuing healthcare is based on an assessment of care needs and how those needs should be met rather than on a specific diagnosis, meaning it is common for these needs to change over time. For this reason if you have been assessed as eligible for continuing healthcare, you can expect your needs to be reviewed within 3 months of the original eligibility decision and at least every 12 months thereafter.
The main focus of the Review is to ascertain whether the care plan or arrangements remain appropriate to meet the needs of the individual, and if so there will be no change. However, where there is clear evidence of a change in needs to such an extent that it may impact on the individual’s eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare, a full Reassessment of eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare will be arranged.
During a Reassessment the most recently completed Decision Support Tool (DST) should be available and should be used to identify any potential change in needs.
If it is deemed there has been a change in eligibility for CHC at Reassessment you should be informed about the proposed change of arrangement. It is essential that alternative funding arrangements are agreed and put into effect before any withdrawal of existing funding in order to ensure continuity of care. Any proposed change should be put in writing to the individual by the organisation that is proposing to make such a change. Click here to read more about the Review and Reassessment of individuals eligible for CHC funding.
In any case, if you are in receipt of either AA or DLA when you become eligible for continuing healthcare it is advisable to contact the AA and DLA units on 03457 123456 to inform them of the change.
Beacon’s caseworkers have successfully appealed hundreds of continuing healthcare cases where the individual was wrongly turned down for continuing healthcare funding, resulting in restitution of millions of pounds for our clients. No two appeals have been the same and unfortunately there is no magic formula for winning an appeal. For over 10 years we have been building up a wealth of knowledge about how to challenge procedural failures, the type of information that is required in order to win a case and the how that information should be presented.
Our free Navigational Toolkit contains detailed advice about how you can prepare for your assessment or that of a relative/loved one, in order to give you the best chance possible of success. It will also help you to navigate the appeal process which can be a daunting experience if you have not been through it before. The Navigational Toolkit can be downloaded using the form at the top of this page.
This is a question we are asked a lot – sometimes even finding the right people to talk to can seem frustratingly difficult. You can search for your local Integrated Care Board by clicking here.